Two “UFO” sightings, the first one recorded by a pilot in Costa Rica during a flight on January 23th 2013 and the second one recorded in Albuquerque, New Mexico on 28th January 2013.
We firmly believe the origin of this sightings is the same: LENS FLARE.
In both cases the light appear when the camera points directly to a bright light source, such us the Sun in the first video or the light outside the house in the second video.
In both cases the light change location with the camera’s movement relative to light sources.
In both cases the light is sorrounded by another clearly lens flare that moves along with it.
Here is a comparisson between both sightings and a lens flare that makes it very clear:
What is really amazing is how the media likes to feed disinformation and ignorance.
A smartphone video that shows a bright orb exploding in the sky sparked a UFO mystery in Sacramento, Calif., but it looks as if the mystery has been solved: It was a weather balloon.
That may sound like the quintessential cover story from the flying-saucer conspiracy, but in this case, the explanation makes perfect sense.
The video was shot through the eyepiece of a telescope by Elijah Prychodzko around 5 p.m. on Dec. 20, and aired by Sacramento’s CBS13 television station on New Year’s Eve. The first video clip shows the orb in the sky with a smaller object swinging around it. Prychodzko calling his nephew over to take a look, and then turned back to shoot another video clip.
TV News report and Footage:
“Oh my God, it just blew up!” Prychodzko can be heard saying. The video showed a haze of fragments floating in the air.
In its account of the Sacramento UFO incident, The Huffington Post said “nobody has come forward to officially explain the event.” On the Above Top Secret forum, however, the discussion quickly turned to weather balloons. The most telling message was this one, attributed to the National Weather Service’s Upper Air Observations Program:
“…It is very likely a weather balloon that burst. The small dot ‘orbiting’ the balloon was the radiosonde that was attached below it with about 70 to 100 feet of string.
“The weather balloon was likely released by the National Weather Service (NWS) upper air station in Oakland, California, at about 3:00 p.m. local time.
“Here is a video of a NWS weather balloon burst taken by a NWS meteorologist through a telescope:
George Cline, observation program officer for the National Weather Service’s office in Sacramento, confirmed that the Oakland station releases its balloons at around 3 p.m. and 3 a.m. PT — and that the flights last about an hour and a half. He noted that the timing for Prychodzko’s reported sighting fits the afternoon timeline.
“That would put it right around the time for a balloon burst,” Cline told NBC News.
As we said in our facebook page: NOPE! There were no UFO sightings during the Olympics in London (yet). All the videos that you may find in other UFO blogs are just helicopters, blimps or even fireworks. Some of the videos aren´t even from the date they claim.
In addition, we will show you some pictures…
Screenshot from Olympics “UFO” video:Picture of Goodyear Blimp:
Exactly! We smelled this from the beginning. That´s why we haven´t posted any news related with the alleged “Baltic Sea UFO”. The ONLY reason it was called “UFO” from the beginning was because of it´s SHAPE, and it doesn´t even necessarily look like a UFO at all! There is no objective reason to believe that “object” is an alien spacecraft. Let´s not feed disinformation!
Here is a segment from an article about this by MSNBC:
Peter Lindberg, head of the Ocean X Team, either has let his imagination run wild or has an ulterior motive, according to Jonathon Hill, a researcher at the Mars Space Flight Facility at Arizona State University, who analyzes images of planetary surface features taken during NASA’s Mars missions.
“Whenever people make extraordinary claims, it’s always a good idea to consider for a moment whether they are personally benefiting from the claim or if it’s a truly objective observation,” Hill told Life’s Little Mysteries.
“In this case, the team clearly has a lot to gain from an extraordinary claim,” he said. “Mr. Lindberg is already making plans to take ‘wealthy tourists’ down in his submarine to view the object. If he had used a rock hammer to break off a small piece of the object, a geologist could have determined whether it was a pillow basalt in a few minutes. But if it turned out to be a pillow basalt and not a ‘mysterious UFO-like object’, Mr. Lindberg wouldn’t have much of a business plan, would he?”